GLM-5.2 from China blocks no toxic prompts
GLM-5.2 is nearly at the cutting edge of AI in capabilities and didn’t zero out any dangerous prompts, unlike Claude Opus 4.7 which zeroed out all of them. Open weights render restrictions conditional, cautions SaferAI.
SaferAI researchers evaluated GLM-5.2, an open-weight language model developed by Chinese company Z.ai, for cyber and bio capabilities, alongside GPT-5.6, Claude Opus 5, and Gemini 3.1. They concluded that GLM-5.2 “is only a few months away from the state-of-the-art.” GLM-5.2 did not zero out any dangerous prompts on the CyberGym benchmark.
Open Weights: Restrictions Can Be Removed at Any Time
In contrast, Claude Opus 4.7 zeroed out all dangerous prompts consistently — to such an extent that SaferAI was unable to finish their evaluation. Z.ai does not have a safety framework, a pre-release testing protocol, or a risk assessment. This means that frontier AI has some kind of restrictions, while open weights have conditional restrictions.
The core issue with open weights is that they can be removed after downloading the model to a private server, fine-tuned, and/or the system instructions modified. Cutting-edge capabilities are diffusing more rapidly than we are able to develop countermeasures, and lack of a safety framework makes this concern tangible.
Source: techcrunch.com
Free course
Stop reading about AI — start building with it
The free Claude Code course: your first site, tool or game — no coding. No upsells, no cross-sells — nothing to buy here.
Start free →▌ Related guides

Author
Evgenii Arsentev
PhD · Founder & CEO, Dad4Kids
Articles · Latest articles