World Models Don’t Have a Crystal Ball — Here’s Why They Often Fail
MENTIS is a framework that incorporates 6 “mental variables” — beliefs, attention, goals, intentions, emotions, norms, and social relationships — and improves the accuracy of world models (Sora/Genie) from 63.3% F1 to 87.9%.
World models are AI agents that forecast future events (e.g., Sora/Genie). However, they lack human beliefs, goals, and emotions, resulting in incorrect predictions.
MENTIS is a framework that introduces 6 “mental variables” (beliefs, attention, goals, intentions, emotions, norms, and social relationships), which increases the accuracy of world models from 63.3% F1 to 87.9%.
Surprisingly, using a less powerful model with MENTIS (84.9%) outperforms a more powerful model without MENTIS (83.6%). Especially in interpersonal situations (+26.4 points). Humans achieve almost perfect performance (98.5%).
Most of the remaining errors come from state transition simulation, i.e., joint dynamics of physical and mental states. (80%)
This study shows that if your agent/robot does not know what humans want, it will continue to make errors, even when it has all the knowledge about the surrounding physical world. It’s time to incorporate “psychology” into world models for practical purposes.
Source: the-decoder.com
Free course
Stop reading about AI — start building with it
The free Claude Code course: your first site, tool or game — no coding. No upsells, no cross-sells — nothing to buy here.
Start free →▌ Related guides

Author
Evgenii Arsentev
PhD · Chief Executive Officer, digital health
Articles · Latest articles