AI Access makes “I don’t know” virtually obsolete.
In this study, researchers discovered that when given access to AI, participants stopped saying “I don’t know” nearly as much, despite being less accurate.
In a paper published on PsyArXiv on September 26th, researchers Marcoccia, Quattrociocchi, and Capraro conducted 5 separate studies with a combined sample size of 3,132. They presented participants with various movie trivia questions, many of which the Step 3.5 Flash model would answer incorrectly. When not using AI, participants correctly responded “I don’t know” 36–44% of the time. However, once given access to the model, they only responded “I don’t know” 3–6% of the time. Their confidence in their response increased from 29.6 to 75.9 on a 100-point scale, but their accuracy decreased from 27.6% to 10%.
I’m not too surprised by these results. In our experience building agents, we often notice this happening. It’s easy for an agent to give a confident response without doing much verification. This is one reason why we always have a human check over our agent’s responses, particularly if the prompt is ambiguous. It’s easiest for a model to make errors in these situations. Being confident and being correct are not the same thing, and this study is yet another reminder of that.
Source: the-decoder.com
Free course
Stop reading about AI — start building with it
The free Claude Code course: your first site, tool or game — no coding. No upsells, no cross-sells — nothing to buy here.
Start free →
Author
Evgenii Arsentev
PhD · Founder & CEO, Dad4Kids
Articles · Latest articles