← All news·2026-06-17·4 min read

Only 16% of Americans See AI as Good for Society

A new Pew survey finds just 16% of Americans expect AI to help society over 20 years, while 40% expect harm — even as a quarter use chatbots daily.

researchsocietypewchatgpt

Only 16% of Americans believe AI will have a positive impact on society over the next 20 years, according to a new Pew Research survey. About 40% expect the impact to be negative, and the rest land somewhere in between. The gap between Wall Street's enthusiasm for AI and the public's mood has rarely looked this wide.

The skepticism runs deeper than a passing mood. Nearly two-thirds of respondents think AI is being developed too fast. 59% don't trust companies to build it safely, and 67% doubt the U.S. government will regulate it in any meaningful way. Even among people under 30 — the group most likely to actually use these tools — just 14% see a positive future. There is no age bracket where optimists are the majority.

People use AI every day and still don't trust it

Here's the twist that makes the numbers worth reading: distrust and usage are climbing together. About a quarter of Americans now use an AI chatbot daily. 44% have used ChatGPT — more than double its 2023 share — with Gemini at 24%, Copilot at 17%, and Meta AI at 14%. Six in ten say they routinely read the AI-generated summaries at the top of search results, often without choosing to. At the same time, roughly half never touch AI in daily life, and nearly three-quarters of people over 65 have never used a chatbot at all. Men outpace women on daily use, 27% to 20%.

The headline isn't 'people hate AI.' It's that adoption is being driven by convenience and default settings, not by confidence. Folks reach for ChatGPT because it's faster, then quietly assume it might be wrong, leaking their data, or making things up. That's a fragile foundation. It's exactly the environment where a single high-profile failure — a hallucinated legal brief, a botched medical answer, a scam built on a cloned voice — can sour millions of people in a week. Trust here is thin, and thin trust breaks loudly.

What I'd actually do

The useful move isn't picking a side in the 'AI good or bad' debate — it's learning to use the tools without trusting them blindly. I treat every AI answer as a confident first draft from a fast, slightly overconfident intern: great for speed, useless as a final authority. Anything that touches money, health, or the law gets verified against a real source before I act on it. That one habit is the difference between being in the 40% who fear AI and the small group that quietly gets value out of it.

For anyone building with these tools, the survey is a free product brief. The market isn't short on capability — it's short on trust. The features that will win aren't flashier demos; they're the boring ones that show their work: citations, an easy way to check a claim, clear limits on what the thing can and can't do. People are already using AI. They just want a reason to believe it.

Source: techcrunch.com

Free course

Stop reading about AI — start building with it

The free Claude Code course: your first site, tool or game — no coding. No upsells, no cross-sells — nothing to buy here.

Start free →
EAEvgenii Arsentev

Author

Evgenii Arsentev

PhD · Chief Executive Officer, digital health